clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com>
Subject Re: VirtualProperty Typing
Date Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:22:17 GMT
Hi Stephane

(found this mail in my draft, sorry for the delay)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Stephane Gamard <stephane@gamard.net> wrote:

> While we're at it, and since it does not hurt basically, I would propose
> that we can add the following attributes to any VirtualProperties:
> - isSearchable
>
Don't get this. Why should somebody define a non-searcheable virtual
property?


> - isType (high level, ie: name, text, date, quantity, …)
>

ok, could you give the complete list of them with a short description.

Cheers,
Reto

>
> This could greatly improve search retrieval and quality over the time of
> next implementation. These attributes might not be mandatory at all, but
> can have a great added value.
>
> _Stephane
>
>
> On October 2, 2013 at 6:31:13 PM, Stephane Gamard (stephane@gamard.net)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> As I dive deeper and deeper into my learning and updates on the rdf.cris
> I've come to realise that the Faceting implementation is not optimal for
> Lucene. We're experiencing extremely slow faceting do to the post-search
> facet collector that iterates thru the document list untill hits.length.
>
> It would be fairly trivial now to implement facets as per Lucene
> specifications. The most "drastic" change that I am yet too ignorant to try
> for myself is to have the ability to know when a VirtualProperty should be
> considered for faceting at indexing time.
>
> This would require a small update of the DefinitionGraph by maybe adding a
> property "facetable" for VirtualProperties?
>
> _Stephane
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message