clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hasan Hasan <ha...@trialox.org>
Subject Re: Moving to Git
Date Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:27:52 GMT
Hi all,

I am fine with that. I'll answer to the comment in the issue as stated by
Reto.
If someone can clean the branches except wrhapi, please do so.
Otherwise I'll do it this evening.

Cheers
Hasan



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@wymiwyg.com>wrote:

> Hi Hasan and all,
>
> I don't think we need the issue-branches. None of it contains active
> development so they can stay read-only in svn. As for the branches I
> suggest to delete everything but the wrhapi branch. I'm fine with the
> clerezza-contribs git repo.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Hasan Hasan <hasan@trialox.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There are some questions from INFRA in our issue
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5976
> > that need to be answered.
> >
> > 1. What are your plans wrt contribs and issues in your SVN tree?
> > a. Not taking them to git and leaving them RO?
> > b. Making them additional git repos (i.e. clerezza-contribs)?
> >
> > I would choose b for contribs. Issues should be moved to branches.
> >
> > 2. Something else?
> > None from me
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Hasan
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message