Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-clerezza-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-clerezza-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B550A10AD7 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44576 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2013 18:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-clerezza-dev-archive@clerezza.apache.org Received: (qmail 44492 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2013 18:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@clerezza.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@clerezza.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@clerezza.apache.org Received: (qmail 44484 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2013 18:42:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.238.45.90] (HELO r2-d2.netlabs.org) (213.238.45.90) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:42:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 52893 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jul 2013 18:41:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-la0-f48.google.com) (farewellutopia@netlabs.org@209.85.215.48) by 0 with ESMTPA; 15 Jul 2013 18:41:41 -0000 Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id lx15so9544026lab.21 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=eYl2Fg5Bvx8NUWYils/K2GvEBDcQvBj3OGoQeLjS5M4=; b=F4t00k39+o7N3c3Fxk7Ipb3+IlHx2jE2z6DElZ1Dh/QuL1ZsEFfq53UyKpU5NwdeHW vPP9b6vBIHZ0eLBk4MSEBN569ag/hp0c6tCIppD53WXLVsKb7dTRr3Xlr4VBrXmzWtxE G0L4wxQe6WSXv5nS3J0JZkDElQ+yRWOZENmL9yQ4szdkv8TdKhYhg7keGhunhvDfYN6k OIFrBAMl8qNZ1gks7+lLywW79CKMieaWz40uuHEV8UUmG2J/BGZ645J8c2BWce1un2k3 8ljEpRlZGhSXDuq9UB9vi+bHbG0V5kIT0bjQRtY896mHy2qemMZBSZ/un7T4uH6ujAUI X2AQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.5.199 with SMTP id u7mr25005087lbu.67.1373913700788; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.125.144 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [31.24.10.206] In-Reply-To: <51E41AE3.2090906@xup.nl> References: <51E41AE3.2090906@xup.nl> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:41:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Do we need Scalable and non-Scalable SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reto_Bachmann=2DGm=FCr?= To: dev@clerezza.apache.org, Rupert Westenthaler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkba6Cr7gvtGTsBgVlPOvnztMRhr+VMn3AwHEE4fmNeNq9aFYN8DlUG7EtP7cewKcTewfsJ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Minto van der Sluis wrote: > Hi, > > The SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider probably performs a little better for a > small number of graphs. Otherwise I see no real benefit. This seems to be a week reason for keeping those 817 lines of code. Maybe @Ruperts knows more reasons? Cheers, Reto