clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com>
Subject Re: Do we need Scalable and non-Scalable SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider?
Date Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:28:41 GMT
Hi Rupert

I agree re. the name. IIRC you recently fixed an issue in the current
SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. Do you remember what this was about?

Cheers,
Reto

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Rupert Westenthaler
<rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am fine with replacing the SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider with the more
> advanced ScalableSingleTdbDatasetTcProvider. However I would suggest
> to keep SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider as name for the component.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Minto van der Sluis <minto@xup.nl> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The SingleTdbDatasetTcProvider  probably performs a little better for a
>>> small number of graphs. Otherwise I see no real benefit.
>>
>> This seems to be a week reason for keeping those 817 lines of code.
>> Maybe @Ruperts knows more reasons?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen

Mime
View raw message