clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org>
Subject Re: What's the current status on sparql 1.1?
Date Thu, 02 May 2013 05:54:56 GMT
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Minto van der Sluis <minto@xup.nl> wrote:

> Seems like QueryableTcProvider is already present, but not yet used.
> Have other part already been implemented as well? Shouldn't work like
> this, due to its intrusive nature, be done in a separate branch?
>

I assumed this might be feasible in an incremental way so that it would not
be so intrusive. A branch is needed when one wants to commit an
intermediate version that's not yet be regression free.

Cheers,
Reto

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message