clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Staying java 6 compatible?
Date Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:09:53 GMT
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Spicar <daniel.spicar@gmail.com>wrote:

> Personally I don't care what is used but I think it is smarter to wait
> before requiring Java 7. The security concern is not a valid argument IMHO
> because the security is a matter of the JVM and not the code. If you are
> concerned you can run Java 6 code in a maintained JVM (openjdk or a java 7
> one).
>
I wasn't arguing that we need to update for security reasons just that we
are targerting our innovative software to a deprecated platform.

Reto


>
> 2013/3/19 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>
>
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> > <rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ...Apache Stanbol is compatible to Java 6 something that would no
> longer
> > > be possible if Clerezza would require Java 7. I would prefer to stay
> > > with Java 6 unless their is a really important reason...
> >
> > +1, IMO it's a bit early to abandon Java 6 and I don't see compelling
> > reasons.
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message