Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30839C5E7 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52648 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2014 14:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-chemistry-dev-archive@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 52588 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2014 14:22:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@chemistry.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@chemistry.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@chemistry.apache.org Received: (qmail 52572 invoked by uid 99); 13 Nov 2014 14:22:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:22:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rferin@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.138 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.138] (HELO e8.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:22:00 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:21:58 -0500 Received: from d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.166) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.108) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:21:57 -0500 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC3138C8039 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:14:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sADELvrJ22806620 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:21:57 GMT Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sADELuIs028158 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:21:56 -0500 Received: from d01ml261.pok.ibm.com (d01ml261.pok.ibm.com [9.63.8.108]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sADELuu3028107 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:21:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: To: dev@chemistry.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Question Regarding DotCMIS 0.6 and OpenCMIS 1.1 X-KeepSent: 85C36DC9:6A5A9369-85257D8F:004E59F6; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1SHF211 December 19, 2013 Message-ID: From: Robert Ferin Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:21:56 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML261/01/M/IBM(Release 9.0.1FP1|April 03, 2014) at 11/13/2014 09:21:56, Serialize complete at 11/13/2014 09:21:56 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004EE95085257D8F_=" X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14111314-0029-0000-0000-0000011EF1BE X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 004EE95085257D8F_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hello, I am hoping someone can answer my question. The latest release of the DotCMIS library is 0.6. I realize that this version number doesn't necessarily relate exactly to the version of OpenCMIS that it supports. Will a client application using DotCMIS 0.6 be able to communicate with a server that supports OpenCMIS 1.1 and use the CMIS 1.0 features, even though it cannot take advantage of the new features available with OpenCMIS 1.1? I assume that it would work, but I have not found anything that clearly confirmed it for me. Thank you, Robert --=_alternative 004EE95085257D8F_=--