cayenne-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne 4.2.M1 release
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:53:41 GMT
Hi Andrus,

Given this is a milestone release, I think it is fine to release with the
AutoAdapter issue.  These releases aren't required or expected to be
production-ready, although that would certainly be nice.  They are for
finding issues needing to be addressed, and you have.  :-)

mrg


On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:24 AM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
wrote:

> So looks like this will affect users of Derby and SQLServer who are also
> using the AutoAdapter (don't know if anyone still NOT using the
> AutoAdapter?). I suppose we can still release the M1, though it will not be
> usable for me unfortunately until this is fixed.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Andrus
>
> > On Apr 13, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimofeev@objectstyle.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andrus,
> >
> > Yes, LinkMove problems related to batch generated keys. The problem is
> > with AutoAdapter, it simply doesn't define
> > supportsGeneratedKeysForBatchInserts() method.
> > DerbyAdapter itself works fine.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Still testing the release... As expected 4.2 is no longer a drop-in
> replacement of 4.0 for either Agrest or LinkMove (because of the Property
> class refactoring). So I made a few tweaks to LM to make it compile [1].
> Now I am getting the following error on commit in a bunch of tests (e.g.
> CreateIT) [2].
> >>
> >> Is this related to 57332e865f5dabb9c7adef4bac9a61137f6828c4 (batch mode
> and PKs on Derby) ?
> >>
> >> (Derby version used in tests is 10.14.2.0 - the latest that supports
> Java 8)
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Apr 7, 2020, at 2:03 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimofeev@objectstyle.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Here is another try for the Cayenne 4.2.M1 release.
> >>>
> >>> Release notes:
> https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/4.2.M1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> >>> Maven repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1038/
> >>> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.2.M1/
> >>>
> >>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Nikita Timofeev
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2 <
> https://github.com/nhl/link-move/tree/cayenne-4.2>
> >>
> >> [2]  org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.4.2.M1 Apr 07 2020
> 09:32:02] Mismatching number of generated PKs: expected 2, instead got 1
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.FlushObserver.nextGeneratedRows(FlushObserver.java:77)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction$1.nextGeneratedRows(DataNodeQueryAction.java:77)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.processGeneratedKeys(BatchAction.java:288)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.runAsBatch(BatchAction.java:133)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.jdbc.BatchAction.performAction(BatchAction.java:94)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNodeQueryAction.runQuery(DataNodeQueryAction.java:97)
> >> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataNode.performQueries(DataNode.java:273)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.lambda$executeQueries$6(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:175)
> >> at java.util.HashMap.forEach(HashMap.java:1288)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.executeQueries(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:174)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.flush.DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.flush(DefaultDataDomainFlushAction.java:89)
> >> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncFlush(DataDomain.java:637)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSyncNoFilters(DataDomain.java:609)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:835)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.lambda$onSync$0(TransactionFilter.java:61)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:180)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$BaseTransactionHandler.performInNewTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:152)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager$NestedTransactionHandler.handle(DefaultTransactionManager.java:95)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:62)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.DefaultTransactionManager.performInTransaction(DefaultTransactionManager.java:40)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.tx.TransactionFilter.onSync(TransactionFilter.java:61)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain$DataDomainSyncFilterChain.onSync(DataDomain.java:834)
> >> at org.apache.cayenne.access.DataDomain.onSync(DataDomain.java:596)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.flushToParent(DataContext.java:737)
> >> at
> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContext.commitChanges(DataContext.java:686)
> >> at
> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.commitTarget(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:63)
> >> at
> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateSegmentProcessor.process(CreateSegmentProcessor.java:44)
> >> at
> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.lambda$createBatchProcessor$1(CreateTask.java:72)
> >> at com.nhl.link.move.batch.BatchRunner.run(BatchRunner.java:57)
> >> at
> com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.create.CreateTask.doRun(CreateTask.java:62)
> >> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:46)
> >> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:31)
> >> at com.nhl.link.move.runtime.task.BaseTask.run(BaseTask.java:39)
> >> at com.nhl.link.move.LmTask.run(LmTask.java:19)
> >> at com.nhl.link.move.itest.CreateIT.testSync(CreateIT.java:24)
> >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> >> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> >> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> >> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> >> at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:160)
> >> at
> com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Nikita Timofeev
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message