Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9417200BCA for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:34:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A7C9B160AF9; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id F0F77160AEF for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:34:33 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 20465 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2016 22:34:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 20455 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2016 22:34:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5F866C6C6C for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.798 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instaclustr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nlILMLVMc6Q for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com (mail-qk0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1E17F5F1BE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x190so67947qkb.0 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:34:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instaclustr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=V1YpztQDsrfHjJnJGHcZcXUvLD237skN2E93gpLu0iI=; b=tz2pyppv3jaP6qIlu3FVAi16Ukl6LTRwxvgIL094jLBjCfmHoKNEx/cPR5GL6qUN2r iSnIRsbljkKK89/0AdMsBYe/uO5nDZ0vOWKRcV1QMJ5I3zVMattcJ5wtET6OPT1K3XhT tZx0pyG5nGE+o2ii6vd8tvxnkXx26awQzlIzMrKd3gKHWk8cD4qAIBU3cRGztSRlVmdi 6CFijJ2NjdriMCRToipeFpIJH0RUF6OmBcd+LNY6NSo4Y5H2ZaRw6DmgkJFDXNR/GqPq mTQslG+QAZTjRviz1BBo1faS/Q/M/coc0BEJ5uF+dIi+5rwr7zEjZ1Rzp436nAhTlj2z LIpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=V1YpztQDsrfHjJnJGHcZcXUvLD237skN2E93gpLu0iI=; b=i0+ufEPy+Mye+x8ZWZiNbBGMehSj/MCfPFrMu0GLsEyNLvmm3gYY63YkP7X/XjA+j4 libYHzaC5kMpEE3rTbcBG6alhRRiLLExY16nuOJiImuL4Z4lbEk0Wg3DmlN4SIeFo0GY NoRiUWpykX2RgfK0XXCHBrUdAbt+kb6uvCUGONqHiCtKh6/tqYPKg8y055EhzHB8qznE +U2Qx+RDjs9SXUwinpM6OHZuopFJ1Wfue2TNetfKRYTslQxjIcsxAQX6maLL4MTwCZs7 3A9tAu3FbStrxrzsU8b6AQnaNmF0CO9uld91rFeFnW1hL0Nt7TBjfT4RMFLvM7LXr+s0 NRLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02G4ovssWGBwdUei6hrHJ+m86bEoo0KUUwbXpni0f5o/iWVodDH63e9Xv1Y4SpOUbK7WyF/I4P7ty60JyiC X-Received: by 10.55.165.6 with SMTP id o6mr3776542qke.237.1479767668517; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:34:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.128.162 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:34:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: kurt Greaves Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it *safe* to issue multiple replace-node at the same time? To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fae7a3bbbed0541d74287 archived-at: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:34:34 -0000 --001a114fae7a3bbbed0541d74287 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 21 November 2016 at 18:58, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Same rack and no range movements, my first instinct is to say yes it is > safe (I like to treat racks as one giant meta node). However I would want > to have a read through the replace code. This is assuming RF<=# of racks as well (and NTS). Kurt Greaves www.instaclustr.com --001a114fae7a3bbbed0541d74287 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 21 November 2016 at 18:58, Ben Bromhead <ben@instaclustr.com><= /span> wrote:
Same rack and no range move= ments, my first instinct is to say yes it is safe (I like to treat racks as= one giant meta node). However I would want to have a read through the repl= ace code.

This is as= suming RF<=3D# of racks as well (and NTS).
--001a114fae7a3bbbed0541d74287--