Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475BC200BC1 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:44:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 45EBB160B08; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 690C3160B02 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:44:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 53407 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2016 15:44:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 53397 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2016 15:44:22 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:44:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7A779C192D for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:44:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qi_T0SGN2-7q for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A633D5F202 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x186so117820157vkd.1 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:44:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=khTkZUU4CzDRaEyPvzJaht5dfqDvmM4gVNjSNlvfr9k=; b=cB5MkRWvZzfPcyvM8LSmfplhSqoR8PSFivrw73qLZfxET6c04AOBwZm2mqNQF96CXB 0gxMl/Moph+R0km68Nb7L/1v7wmdmsrUrVYNUn7OUdnNBooZ4yeQ7StPV6TqgDA2Ae5k oAXijxOj4BAo3xzFFTiXJJn/x4RjrP7U/JQLH3n4NaWBUrPPrXeLU2UjWWcyTxr4BmYW ZYhzY5pkq6SJQXDxGu8C0aphPEpnZcqYJb3MEskDavLjp9pRT7YDudISj9PZqYg3JSmA c0kpANlxQEB5YugoY0EGWc2eLuZ+Bo6yfbukjSkV4a3+PRfqGgSrmze9PCCk08DN6hnO M6Kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=khTkZUU4CzDRaEyPvzJaht5dfqDvmM4gVNjSNlvfr9k=; b=QOQKIRbz9/wJkrZA9Y3+zqRZvWfbHmVaDPzX+RyKY7QXBbQmv5SvA/dfTgzS2bi0NJ 0izzorjLenalagEDA8UZsOy+w221bnXtdzQ/Zwb83lkkbOADk4MJxCMkrgOyHY91qye6 GImXrFHrRmVRIPpgELci2qHCXKejQvAlJorJJtq5+Rmps0paJsKGJhxXw0rQDVkg5k0V B7pbHzz+HtlGT1zOh6EKKylFJm5s1az6bIwTrSM5K0rJW5wb6QVA8ttPNwpHfB0AF1Fb 65dint4XLdASYnd2E2+QCSqb4K0R7vEkbjAk0NeKrIdFDomKww1NbMOSyyEFuucz00tJ 78pw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcRL/ZkkYGJSmjHsM1MfgEWh005R8X8FVAA3vHIh9Eu60LunLbraIrkkCZo48tO0skrZqyhvztDRbR2vQ== X-Received: by 10.31.96.202 with SMTP id u193mr1874909vkb.53.1479311058428; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:44:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.48.141 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:43:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alain RODRIGUEZ Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:43:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can nodes in c* cluster run different versions ? To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e52f026732405416cf20a archived-at: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:44:25 -0000 --001a114e52f026732405416cf20a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hey Techpyaasa, Are you aware of this documentation? https://docs.datastax.com/en/upgrade/doc/upgrade/cassandra/upgrdCassandraDetails.html Basically yes, you can have multiple versions, but you want to make this multi-version time it as short as possible. As it might take few days as it will have 'upgrade sstables' , so just > wanted to know would be there any possibility during this mismatch of c* > version among nodes in cluster during this upgrade process? To make the upgrade as short as possible I use to migrate the whole cluster and only after upgrade sstables. This minimises the time you're running multiple version. The only (soft) limitation, is that you shouldn't be streaming data around (do not bootstrap, repair or remove a node). It might work, that's why I say "soft limitation" but it might not work, there is no guarantee, it mainly depends on changes that were made between versions I believe. C*heers, ----------------------- Alain Rodriguez - @arodream - alain@thelastpickle.com France The Last Pickle - Apache Cassandra Consulting http://www.thelastpickle.com 2016-11-16 11:12 GMT+01:00 techpyaasa . : > Hi all, > > We are currently running c*-2.0.17 with 2 datacenters each with 18 nodes. > > We like to upgrade to c*-2.1.16. Can we upgrade first all nodes(one by > one) in one dc and then go to next data center. > > As it might take few days as it will have 'upgrade sstables' , so just > wanted to know would be there any possibility during this mismatch of c* > version among nodes in cluster during this upgrade process? > > Thanks > Techpyaasa > --001a114e52f026732405416cf20a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Techpyaasa,=C2=A0

Are you aware of = this documentation?


Basically yes, you can have multiple v= ersions, but you want to make this multi-version time it as short as possib= le.

<= span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">As it might take few days as it will have &= #39;upgrade sstables' , so just wanted to know would be there any possi= bility during this mismatch of c* version among nodes in cluster during thi= s upgrade process?

To make the upgra= de as short as possible I use to migrate the whole cluster and only after u= pgrade sstables. This minimises the time you're running multiple versio= n.

The only (soft) limitation, is that you shouldn= 't be streaming data around (do not bootstrap, repair or remove a node)= . It might work, that's why I say "soft limitation" but it mi= ght not work, there is no guarantee, it mainly depends on changes that were= made between versions I believe.

C*heers,
-----------------------
Alain Rodriguez - @arodream - alain@thelastpickle.com
France

The Last Pickle - Apache Cassandra Consu= lting



2016-11-16 11:12 GMT+01:00 tec= hpyaasa . <techpyaasa@gmail.com>:
Hi all,

We are currently running c*-2.0.= 17 with 2 datacenters each with 18 nodes.

We like to upgrade to c*-2= .1.16. Can we upgrade first all nodes(one by one) in one dc and then go to = next data center.

As it might take few days as it will have 'upg= rade sstables' , so just wanted to know would be there any possibility = during this mismatch of c* version among nodes in cluster during this upgra= de process?

ThanksTechpyaasa

--001a114e52f026732405416cf20a--