Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED70E92E7 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11127 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 16:39:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 11066 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 16:39:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 11052 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 16:39:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:39:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tivv00@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.172] (HELO mail-iy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.210.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:39:41 +0000 Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so1304449iab.31 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:39:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=w85fjFSrfa7mpKDlkAAQvaS7+OvufRtWfmeIztoy7Y0=; b=PNJtZl7vIYNwA7wMZbbmwAzTUnXGl4eBsD3CalSJnYhMydixCGEoEIM4+J3JOEGjAY GbX8WkfpTF1dfMEjpO1jUmjiXGpx3ST5bbLMDXXO0Ufr76im3nbHGc1YBR+PeJZPi9Wo vzyhtOtfZN616uB7ESPYGjgVw29sBOQvgca7o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.243.2 with SMTP id lk2mr3314895icb.8.1325781560489; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:39:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.140.6 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:39:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:39:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: is it bad to have lots of column families? From: =?KOI8-U?B?96bUwcymyiD0yc3eydvJzg==?= To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba3fd26ff6777d04b5ca9263 --90e6ba3fd26ff6777d04b5ca9263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2012/1/5 Michael Cetrulo > in a traditional database it's not a good a idea to have hundreds of > tables but is it also bad to have hundreds of column families in cassandra? > thank you. > As far as I can see, this may raise memory requirements for you, since you need to have index/bloom filter for each column family in memory. -- Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn --90e6ba3fd26ff6777d04b5ca9263 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2012/1/5 Michael Cetrulo <mail2samus@gmail.com>=
in a traditional database it's not a good a idea to have hundreds of ta= bles but is it also bad to have hundreds of column families in cassandra? t= hank you.

As far as I can see, this may raise memory requireme= nts for you, since you need to have index/bloom filter for each column fami= ly in memory.

--
Best regards,
=A0Vi= talii Tymchyshyn
--90e6ba3fd26ff6777d04b5ca9263--