Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83796 invoked from network); 19 May 2009 01:32:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2009 01:32:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 28103 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 01:32:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28058 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 01:32:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28049 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2009 01:32:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 01:32:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of goffinet@digg.com designates 64.191.203.36 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.191.203.36] (HELO mail.digg.com) (64.191.203.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 01:32:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digg.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE38A85055 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 18:31:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -4.337 X-Spam-Level: Received: from mail.digg.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digg.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3qPYDR0gLIX for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 18:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.16.222] (diggstage01.digg.com [64.191.203.34]) by mail.digg.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D53A85048 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 18:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <9E9DA104-15B8-4D4A-9ADC-211C45FAE652@digg.com> From: Chris Goffinet To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: multi-table Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:31:50 -0700 References: <5978F24F-9C47-4770-A6B2-8B773DC2B5EF@digg.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Flag: NO X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.337 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599] Great! Sure, contact me off-list. -Chris On May 18, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Jonathan ellis wrote: > Different apps will have different performance characteristics (and > different key domains, which can also be important). So there are > operational reasons to prefer cluster-per-app. > > That said, multi table support is high on my priority list. The > changes required are straightforward so I'd love to help someone > dive in as opposed to just doing it myself. :) > > -Jonathan > > On May 18, 2009, at 7:56 PM, Chris Goffinet wrote: > >> Has anyone here needed multi-table support yet in Cassandra? Anyone >> willing to share use cases where you felt maybe you didn't need >> multi-table support? Seems just a bit odd it isn't there yet :) >> >> --- >> Chris Goffinet >> goffinet@digg.com >> >> >> >> >>