Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 88624 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2001 01:05:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 88613 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 01:05:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ryan Bloom Reply-To: rbb@covalent.net Organization: Covalent Technologies To: Cliff Woolley , Subject: Re: [PATCH] buckets sms phase 2 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:59:12 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20010904005913.5957D46993@koj.rkbloom.net> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Monday 03 September 2001 15:21, Cliff Woolley wrote: I seriously dislike adding an SMS to every bucket. I believe we are much better off just creating a per-thread free bucket list. That keeps us from ever calling free while dealing with a request, and over time, we will stop calling malloc. The SMS code is not currently being used in the server, so by adding an SMS to every bucket, we have added two different memory allocation schemes to the server, which is a bad thing. Ryan > Okay, so since some of you were displeased with the size of the phase 1 > patch that I committed, here's your chance to review phase 2 beforehand. > > Assuming you all approve of this, I'll patch httpd to match. > > --Cliff > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > cliffwoolley@yahoo.com > Charlottesville, VA -- ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net --------------------------------------------------------------