apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Pane <bp...@pacbell.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Turn apr_table_t into a hash table
Date Sat, 08 Sep 2001 18:29:05 GMT
Ryan Bloom wrote:

>On Friday 07 September 2001 14:23, Brian Pane wrote:
>>The attached patches change the apr_table_t implementation from
>>a linear list to a hash table (not an apr_hash_t, though!).  With
>>this change, I'm seeing a ~3% improvement in throughput when
>>delivering a 0-byte file over the loopback on Linux.  (I used this
>>0-byte test case to measure the inherent overhead in the httpd, without
>>transmission time clouding the results.)
>I dislike this.  Why are we putting a second hash table into APR?  If we want
>to use a hash, then ues an apr_hash_t.  If apr_hash_t doesn't support something
>that we MUST have to do this, then fix apr_hash_t.  Having two different hash
>alorithms in APR, one of them hidden under a tables API, seems kind of hackish
>to me.
Are you arguing in favor of using apr_hash_t in the implementation of 
or using apr_hash_t in place of apr_table_t in the request_rec?  I'm 
with the former, but not the latter.


View raw message