Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59575 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2008 17:55:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2008 17:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 65087 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2008 17:55:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65061 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2008 17:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65050 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2008 17:55:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:55:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.158] (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.46.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:54:38 +0000 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so2599086ywa.86 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=UNlqXPavPHRJC0i02wz5qUtJoSBAimZygS1snHABpLU=; b=ovnvWOVOwfa7fLZcK+pGaaD5uNyqSHaXSoYTBxyloXdfu9ESWTeHyh8qr5jKbztzCF Pq5HP+OIjmf5eWBHlIvGIsiA8Go2HlDOmk+aN8x2Ct7FCgi1tekpXYl/19w1GBb3PC97 htKBuiR110l5sggpk25IS/v6ohgXz9S5ZuG2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=OLT4FcRjvJGikNvjdyWvJqGF0iqHeeZC5Of/5MgJoMNtMahObPfsod/+BFzR3a5gj6 7OBLxxOkKo/U7Is/hbwVbI0FH2Nw2sIe3ntup382Hf4rTUiQmI0xhsUeLMkrc4wKsu3u YiruocLuwE6Y5KFsLF0r3I6txdcSIXvn3kVkI= Received: by 10.100.201.16 with SMTP id y16mr2489711anf.90.1216230902204; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.242.17 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3a73c17c0807161055s1786c886lacc4cb05a9cd0173@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:55:01 +0100 From: "Gary Tully" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Test case good practice In-Reply-To: <487E033E.70406@farpost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <487E033E.70406@farpost.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Denis, have a look at some of the tests and extend or copy. For example, for some of the network functionality a bunch of tests for issues exist at: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/network/ 2008/7/16 Denis Bazhenov : > As developers you probably have a lot of headache (as i have :) ). > Otherwise, we have some situations where broker behaviour is unclear and > seems like a bug. So, can someone set an example of good test case for bug > reproduction? I mean, good test case for you as developers who will fix the > bug. >