Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jira@apache.org
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12853073.1438989193000.61981.1439508105693@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12853073.1438989193000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12853073.1438989193000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12853073.1438989193652@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (ACCUMULO-3956) Improve validation of
 configuration and arguments with guava Predicates
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Christopher Tubbs resolved ACCUMULO-3956.
-----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Improve validation of configuration and arguments with guava Predicates
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3956
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3956
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Christopher Tubbs
>            Assignee: Christopher Tubbs
>             Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There's a few places in our code which could benefit from additional validation of arguments and configuration by using the built-in Guava Predicates. This makes some checks that we're doing a bit more readable, and enables us to do more expressive validation checks.
> Specifically, I see room for improvement in our {{PropertyType}} validators (which currently do very limited regex validation) and, to a lesser degree, {{o.a.a.core.util.Validator}}.
> I intend to replace these with proper Predicates to determine their validity.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)