zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Han <h...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Can SSL capability be satisfied by a smaller dependency than netty-all?
Date Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:07:05 GMT
>> SSL capability can be satisfied by one of the smaller netty jars, rather
than netty-all

A brief look on the imports indicates that we might only need the handler
and transport jars from Netty. I'd suggest to create a JIRA to request this
change.

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:11 PM Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:

> We neglected to notice that netty is a required dependency for ZK SSL
> when we upgraded to ZK 3.5.5 in Solr.  We have an issue to track this:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13665
>
> I was noticing that the netty-all jar included in ZK is nearly 4MB ...
> and we will have to include it twice in the Solr download because it is
> needed for the SolrJ client as well as the Solr server.  The Solr
> download is already quite large ... increasing it by another 7MB is
> painful.
>
> I'm hoping that ZK's SSL capability can be satisfied by one of the
> smaller netty jars, rather than netty-all.  Is that a question that can
> be answered here on the ZK list?  The specific class that is mentioned
> by the error is included in netty-transport.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message