From user-return-11233-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@zookeeper.apache.org Thu Jan 25 17:08:51 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C301A180651 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:08:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B25FF160C3D; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C03160C13 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:08:50 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 58405 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2018 16:08:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 58392 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2018 16:08:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:08:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8AB29180624 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:08:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.898 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3iPWX_l7QANv for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com (mail-oi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id ABB7C5F2C3 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id t78so5572696oih.4 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BiTMANegOFiZdDTkao2SMtS26XCnR+Biwk353ioTrUc=; b=Z0+Irpkau6oFlj8EZZVc6fXg0kwu5e7NrA/cgYqFjE6ZG6PcBGw34T3K2UBE66DfIR lGxvDPRad2I+fMmYCQQe3+E3EDADktiK0xpBU0uY2gKJt3fSWY/k6t8xXshUFVpUtOcf Q1I0ncMuYbLehfBbpD62evp7tQ0UdtfQN7L1wsPxfzVjawaECGznWQJDtKqZSTgnlo73 wfUuvORkAbbOTrdWpcDGPFSBw5GI6CCZUC0X4gQh2IWvm+7RVVVySvB9R2vIA5e1odxT S7WWRti9+FXwsw5lmaWEKhqo8xQh5Hlc4hS73GtsBUqJLxDsXQWUbI0pcRUIbbJVzCEy ALlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BiTMANegOFiZdDTkao2SMtS26XCnR+Biwk353ioTrUc=; b=gH1Ylfw535/LbfUY+MFtp/paogkGVXzOoTszjZBSPgG1a4btjeDGzCUa3beMqb3DXD VUyFfSQJYyvXb6T17YINzVmd2GWOCLNI4oSaPUpokrlX30BpsumaS3S8eKItLATVaLDa Aqdzh9/xRnl+8xqiBlBT0vtC1fQ8pqR+qAzy8EjsN7RKTTlpGKmkirqyf/P7HgsI5bn7 qyTQme52JKDRDNquCp0QZ1SviwCipsJ4W44xN54g1yMH9K5/m5/xVHcOdifGEbqswUUO Twbnnmtq7qCqb90g+FM2+RHTGP2rikfJIsy5adZkAvdVtlW4XKoV89Wq5v6g/HFXQ3e3 7HYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytd7N2J+ZWyrurZtTc9HE87rOMiai/i5j1EQd0P/BGh6hiwDlONU kwLVs8RGk8cx4e7MYW3Xhy70c4qz+J5vhk0MRRBlyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225FShmWDRG6xAJJ0TkF9HmnLbdMMrTwTYHcUBDq+QZZ8PcecJNZziNn2RRRcGxGoyQUmgkpy/c8o9tOkeMnkxw= X-Received: by 10.202.225.9 with SMTP id y9mr2894950oig.325.1516896525657; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:08:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.91.23 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:08:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andor Molnar Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:08:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: transaction log directory on VM To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ceaa292d15305639bfee1" --001a113ceaa292d15305639bfee1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Kathryn, The only benefit I can think of is that transaction logs cannot steal space from other parts of the system. e.g. root filesystem Other than that it should be on a physically different drive for performance gain. Andor On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Page, Jeremy wrote: > There are still reasons to keep it on an isolated file system, although > it's not as important as if you have multiple physical disks (especially if > they're spinning disks as opposed to SSDs). > > ________________________________ > From: Kathryn Hogg > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:00 AM > To: user@zookeeper.apache.org > Subject: transaction log directory on VM > > If we are running zookeeper on virtual machines, what is the recommended > best practice in regards to the transaction log directory? We can create a > dedicated virtual disk for the transaction logs but what if that vdi/vmdk > file is sitting on the same drive on the host OS? > > -- > Kathryn Hogg > Open Access Technology International, Inc. > 3660 Technology Drive NE, Minneapolis, MN 55418 > > CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email and any attachment(s) contain > confidential and/or proprietary information of Open Access Technology > International, Inc. Do not copy or distribute without the prior written > consent of OATI. If you are not named a recipient to the message, please > notify the sender immediately and do not retain the message in any form, > printed or electronic. > > ________________________________ > > Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying > to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the > content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance > of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the > binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual > signature that is included in any attachment. > --001a113ceaa292d15305639bfee1--