Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FCE200BDF for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:03:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 23767160B30; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D08A160AF6 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:03:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 68176 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2016 17:03:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 68160 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2016 17:03:39 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:03:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6A43CC1E22 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:03:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.12 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6nsi15XUKJP for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm32-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm32-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0F9015F19B for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.196.81.174] by nm32.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2016 17:03:30 -0000 Received: from [68.142.230.69] by tm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2016 17:03:30 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp226.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2016 17:03:30 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 292349.49926.bm@smtp226.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Gb6ABdQVM1mLAG6HId79BM_3wRxAKe9zZmQLsEg54kyhA.5 93Dtg2sW2URVWP3RHnw19x2u34qvbR3.a4nWGoy1AOVbbtLyFxzMaJId0Gl0 dN_jGKliicAIuDG.Jshd5UiKKTMhb4oSJ4ygwGCc8eunYG_OI4KcKz75HD9n TKV.y2VXa0FLqr3RJcOc4TpWPO4G47Zw2eF_ZOIHu8oIpH5mwolakrics0ff 47ctkqRHMDIoCr3_29VWbjAyLbJ0isp06oG8.ulP7Rk9feE07Xd4OjWuiIxR cJsMaBYRlOq5VPLioa8XDkVrz4Xneu6k52QRMZXZN1HuVrcrBSWDvOQTD632 1yVfHo1h0mhbV1BAfWe46Vz.vYuVcZBJP9Gd20fM2HTAZHF5dNT5csgObUBR jYujkEaiYz0NS.t0x_LM8aiDUkVmFSDqNEa8lGFvNDKoP7sLEw3tDcbGBsj1 pygp_k1.oLtyDM_2or2yTR.5rAynyrLUVpLzYYpoalwSUokKKQ5VDPzjWOno TPU65llZDt0A8IBcRCgFH1iAYP.BlcBucPNsZP0em6Q-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: nYYn_RKswBClKuYSnKEmNNz2RsOq From: Hadriel Kaplan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: identifying container nodes Message-Id: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:03:27 -0500 To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) archived-at: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:03:42 -0000 Howdy, Is there some way for us to identify a node as being a Container node, = distinct from persistent or ephemeral nodes, via a client? Inside of the server, it stores the client's session number in the = ephemeral owner ID for ephemeral nodes, a value of 0 to identify = persistent nodes, and a value of CONTAINER_EPHEMERAL_OWNER (a = Long.MIN_VALUE) to identify Container nodes. But when passing back the = Stat structure of Container nodes to clients, it uses 0 instead of the = Long.MIN_VALUE, making it appear as a persistent node to the client. Is = there some reason for this behavior? It seems easy enough for me to change that behavior for my own use, in = DataNode.copyStat(), but I'm concerned about making this change if = there's some good reason it was being faked out. -hadriel