zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Issue with NettyServerCnxn.java
Date Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:52:23 GMT
Hi Yuliya - my read is that sendResponse in NIOServerCnxn is logging, then
dropping, any Exceptions encountered during sendResponse. In other words
it's doing best effort response. Not sure if that is "correct", but that's
what it's currently doing in NIO. Surprisingly it's also hiding any
IOExceptions, which is part of the method signature as defined by
ServerCnxn. Some of the calling code is trying to handle IOException in
some cases which is odd... I suspect it was an oversight in ZOOKEEPER-597,
but I'm not sure.

Ben any insight?


On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:15 PM, yuliya Feldman <yufeldman@yahoo.com.invalid
> wrote:

> Hello there,
> We have been extensively testing Netty connection versus NIIO and there
> are some issues that show up I wanted to get community response on.
> In the process of testing https://issues.apache.
> org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2509 fix we identified that sendResponse()
> method may try to do some operations after close() was invoked - as
> channel.close() in Netty is asynch. and subsequently lead to some NPE.
> NPE itself is not a good thing but the problems aggravates with the fact
> that propagation of NPE will lead to main processing thread exiting and at
> that point ZK server becomes unresponsive - since no requests will be
> processed anymore.
> In NIOServerCnxn.java in sendResponse() it is catching Exception and just
> logs a warning  which was added as part of https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-597
> I am trying to understand what a behavior should be in case of any
> exception in sendResponse.
> Any insight would be highly appreciated
> Thanks,Yuliya

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message