Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD32819454 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39596 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2016 02:02:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 39514 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2016 02:02:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 39502 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2016 02:02:19 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:02:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id ED4711A12F6 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:02:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Um9w3KIrWZj for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2DC895F240 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id u206so8507806wme.1 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:02:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=EFXmqVBohQk52yjc0R4MKkIypntDjLRcOeqjWYyhpjI=; b=oEyk1c+7FbEi2bKmtZPekUMp/tBF6gGw56MA55For52p5giLiKMnTycXW+zXKa+Jq+ lkZEPPrx8lYfktojrodSPKMwQcnj1qzRoYi/mgIZrdYzPR5+xdWBVJB1HZAmBYh7l3m9 uPSGttRxgVgAkFiylonyeRxdB9733U/7hoKYE0goDpcGjYj1QYiKxRYl33g1D4wiq5eS uoiPSLhGt1m/1EYtC/O6DMZ5ONyIu0wxJY1ocxl5rPkUyIRLUZ7ULPX64fr9qP2fLUD9 qPWx0HvA0jzoF/vQrePhE1JM7dCB0xleIyIHcWvmVNe1CcRKAzaNWLOok9dOOqUtgpN/ dduA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=EFXmqVBohQk52yjc0R4MKkIypntDjLRcOeqjWYyhpjI=; b=NVRfxjegjMKioYXffOZV7Z1mrrG91YY7aNRfvGZ6G34e84ofpBkF9CnAH2YJMRY1nE aTDwq4I98YilulzyazS0CtCbuMyDm4ycEjnJxIfT1rGSO155BuLsDotLluGSLKAK1Vnb M2j21t8i+KUpR7gBTC5zPF3K9SNijh5OK74vcEV07iOkv7bGRY6BWL7QYCoG+xq9aEmS HYjvM9m0RrRk5VxH/DDAsDQJ/BTeFBSlY5e3O4+K8D/pidXVkX5MXvzbO0IzuMTQKvbQ MPFm0ctaiDYdcSfFGOxKASrA01rvJtLbWk6FvlovHqCMHM+8z5rA4fOv8Cwj43SmvmYA /nEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVuIeSpUm9oTYjmivATGYbUbXA2rcd4YEj34mRtYQml6rrsidcDiM+y1+gNkPZUIgG5DMnwFa0vxFwMWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.60.134 with SMTP id j128mr1005968wma.71.1460426530626; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.211.10 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:02:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: node 2 not rejoining cluster From: s influxdb To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148e5e09422380530400cdf --001a1148e5e09422380530400cdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 created a parallel independant zookeeper cluster on the same set of machines with different ports and that worked. This indicates the port was the issue. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, s influxdb wrote: > reboot of the server didn't help > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:50 PM, s influxdb wrote: > >> I ran tcpdump on all the three nodes. >> It looks like that for every [PSH, ACK] there is a missing [ACK] from >> the other nodes to this 2nd node on port 3888. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM, s influxdb wrote: >> >>> Thanks Flavio for your quick replies. >>> The zookeeper version is 3.4.6 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You need to determine why it is not receiving notification messages. >>>> From >>>> the information you've given, it doesn't look like a zookeeper code >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> BTW, which version are you using? >>>> >>>> -Flavio >>>> On 7 Apr 2016 21:20, "s influxdb" wrote: >>>> >>>> > nothin on the iptables firewall . >>>> > >>>> > What options do i have to reconnect this node to the cluster ? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:14 AM, s influxdb >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > telnet works on 2888 and 3888 to the other nodes. Now i see >>>> > > java.net.SocketTimeoutException: connect timed out messages in the >>>> logs >>>> > for >>>> > > node 2 >>>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Flavio Junqueira >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> I only see notifications from the node to itself. It says that it >>>> is >>>> > >> connected to 1, but it doesn't seem to be receiving the >>>> notification >>>> > from >>>> > >> 1. It also doesn't seem to be receiving the connection request >>>> from 3. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Last time I've seen something like this was due to iptables rules, >>>> but >>>> > if >>>> > >> it was working before and no configuration has changed, then I >>>> don't >>>> > know >>>> > >> what it could be. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> -Flavio >>>> > >> >>>> > >> > On 07 Apr 2016, at 05:43, s influxdb >>>> wrote: >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > this is the pastie >>>> > >> > http://pastie.org/10788301 >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:41 PM, s influxdb < >>>> elastic.l.k@gmail.com> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >> We had one of the node giving OOM java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: >>>> unable >>>> > to >>>> > >> >> create new native thread and then being unresponsive. >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> We tried to add the node back to the cluster but with no luck. >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> It doesn't seem to "Receive any notification " messages from >>>> the >>>> > other >>>> > >> >> nodes. >>>> > >> >> Keeps "Sending notifications " in loop >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> Please see attached the logs of the node that is out of >>>> rotation. >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> Any inputs appreciated. >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> Thanks >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> > --001a1148e5e09422380530400cdf--