Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: powell molleti <powellm79@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Reply-To: powell molleti <powellm79@yahoo.com>
To: "user@zookeeper.apache.org" <user@zookeeper.apache.org>
Message-ID: <1697048787.1828192.1450293931001.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM+wfv4zD7K2JxDP802JN2-LRyCGUirQByzM_hMu=Tb2FsBLYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAM+wfv4zD7K2JxDP802JN2-LRyCGUirQByzM_hMu=Tb2FsBLYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Zookeeper over SSH tunnels
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_1828191_309308594.1450293930997"

------=_Part_1828191_309308594.1450293930997
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Anand,
That sounds good and I understand and have seen the similar requirements an=
d solutions used.I am working on fixing the serial connect timeout problem =
too as part of addressing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-9=
01
Please look at the discussion regarding this here:https://issues.apache.org=
/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045?focusedCommentId=3D15054621&page=3Dcom.atlassia=
n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15054621
ThanksPowell.=20


    On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 8:40 AM, Anand Parthasarathy <anpartha@=
avinetworks.com> wrote:
=20

 Hi Powell,

Yes. This is exactly what I am facing. In our solution, we have a need to
secure multiple processes across the nodes. So, we determined that we will
have one way to=C2=A0 bring these nodes under a trust domain and have the
interconnect securely via SSH tunnels (we could have used a ssl tunnel or
vpn solution all of which is similar in effect).

It is disappointing to see that the behavior is so tied to the connection
behavior even though ultimately, the connection is brought down in either
case.

Thanks,
Anand.


------=_Part_1828191_309308594.1450293930997--