Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6974B1029D for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84753 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2015 09:09:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 84704 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2015 09:09:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 84692 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2015 09:09:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:09:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of samweisberg@openmailbox.org designates 62.4.1.34 as permitted sender) Received: from [62.4.1.34] (HELO mail.openmailbox.org) (62.4.1.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:09:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916862E057F for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:08:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org; h=user-agent:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :mime-version:received:received; s=openmailbox; t=1426928917; bh=Ri5fgnmpKdWqDX4YN3jorKmStrSedpCrQoIawGOccUg=; b=DiWu6C+LCx6u 6XhkHLrCoSkTQwoanAVFhHiELxniJqLKNlvXxw/rtHtzsNXptwR/tmx4EzGfomGa DemB8FM5CY6lgSepCpxQOvasyhAOFidFt6VtFC4QFlddfZaki6giykiUiq8pezzo Wf/CIGC7SHnXaJwmEDYUfi4LNFV6ANE= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34]) by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVGQQKdDudzM for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:08:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.openmailbox.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC562E05CB for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:08:37 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:08:37 +0100 From: Sam Weisberg To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Question about 3.5.0 stability and versioning Message-ID: <61c9572d8230356aad37962a4da4de81@openmailbox.org> X-Sender: samweisberg@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi list, I am a little confused about the versioning of the 3.5 release branch. When looking at the homepage, it sais the 3.5 release "is alpha quality" and it is suffixed with a -alpha tag. When I first looked at the github releases[1] however, it seams to indicate that there has already been a 3.5 release candidate and a 3.5 release. In addition, the devs seem to be gearing up for a 3.5.1 release[2], which would be curious if there was not even a stable 3.5.0 release. There is also no longer an active milestone for 3.5.0 in Jira. Considering all that, I have a bit of trouble understanding the implications of the -alpha suffix of the 3.5.0 release. Can the 3.5.0 release be considered stable and is just not widely used? I would appreciate it if someone could clarify this for me a bit. Cheers, Sam [1] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/releases [2] https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-dev/201502.mbox/%3CCANLc_9JktxbnYuyW2EbvFEcRoaZWMsPf38YdoM=5JLWLUsZDNA@mail.gmail.com%3E