Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shralex@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1414069002518-7580446.post@n2.nabble.com>
References: <1414069002518-7580446.post@n2.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:14:14 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CANcXBFMsbp4fZJ30MaqZr-_9vDjsNrX7kR=zmd_z06SiJg+_UA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Latency in asynchronous mode
From: Alexander Shraer <shralex@gmail.com>
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520ef5749b4f2050616d753

--bcaec520ef5749b4f2050616d753
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Maybe due to queueing at the leader in asynchronous mode - if in your
experiment you have one client in sync mode the leader has just one op in
the queue at a time
On Oct 23, 2014 1:57 PM, "Ibrahim" <i.s.el-sanosi@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I am testing ZooKeeper latency in Asynchronous mode. I am sending update
> (write) requests to Zookeeper cluster that consists of 5 physical
> Zookeeper.
>
> So, when I run the stat command I get high latency like:
> Latency min/avg/max: 7/339/392
> Latency min/avg/max: 1/371/627
> Latency min/avg/max: 1/371/627
> Latency min/avg/max: 1/364/674
> I guess such high latency correspond to fsync (batch requests). But I wish
> if someone could help me and explain this behaviour.
>
> However, testing Zookeeper using Synchronous mode, it gives me reasonable
> result like:
> Latency min/avg/max: 6/24/55
> Latency min/avg/max: 7/22/61
> Latency min/avg/max: 7/30/65
>
> Note that the latency measures in milliseconds.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> Ibrahim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/Latency-in-asynchronous-mode-tp7580446.html
> Sent from the zookeeper-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--bcaec520ef5749b4f2050616d753--