zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Junqueira <fpjunque...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: Asynchronous API's and monotonicity
Date Fri, 06 Jun 2014 21:04:19 GMT
I don't quite understand the correlation among amount of data per znode, queues, and being
a well known problem. You might as well be right, though.

-Flavio

On 06 Jun 2014, at 21:25, Diego Oliveira <lokimad@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mudit,
> 
>    Just to let you know, Zookeeper isn't the best choice for queue, it has
> problems in the amount of data that a anode can handle. It is a very well
> know problem.
> 
> Att,
>     Diego
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Mudit Verma <mudit.f2004912@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks James and Rakesh. It helps :)
>> 
>> On 05 Jun 2014, at 21:07, James A. Robinson <jimr@highwire.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
>> rakeshr.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> But this behaviour may not be same if we perform operations through
>>> different clients. Here network delays or other factors may cause
>> different
>>> clients to see a change.
>>> 
>>> I'm assuming the other important factor is to ensure that he's
>>> either got a single control loop dispatching the async calls to
>>> his zookeeper connection or that he's coordinating the threads
>>> himself to impose ordering.
>>> 
>>> Otherwise, if one has threads x1 and x2 running in parallel,
>>> he'd have no guarantee which thread dispatched its async
>>> call to zookeeper first.
>>> 
>>> Jim
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Att.
> Diego de Oliveira
> System Architect
> diego@diegooliveira.com
> www.diegooliveira.com
> Never argue with a fool -- people might not be able to tell the difference


Mime
View raw message