zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Check Peck <comptechge...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Load on Zookeeper cluster?
Date Wed, 09 Apr 2014 04:46:40 GMT
How would I do this then? Is there any existing frameworks which I can use
or I need to write my own code for this?


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <michi@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:

> Ok maybe you should try exactly that instead of using zk-latency.py.
> Create 600 sessions and do a get once every minute. ZooKeeper should
> be able to handle that.
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Check Peck <comptechgeeky@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Actual scenario will be -
> >
> >
> > Test :- 3 node ZK cluster, 600 sessions each will do one read
> > operation(getChildren call) every one minute.
> >
> > At what configuration I should try it out.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <michi@cs.stanford.edu>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > So my question is what does this line mean at the end? Does it say, it
> >> > can
> >> > do a get request call at a rate of 2557 requests per second?
> >> >
> >> >      get         100           znodes  in     39 ms (0.390978 ms/op
> >> > 2557.689587/sec)
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> > Also I was interested to see how much load a 3 node ZK cluster can
> >> > handle.
> >> > In my case, most of the call will be "get" (get the data from only one
> >> > znode) on the ZK cluster So with the above test I should be able to
> get
> >> > some
> >> > idea right?
> >>
> >> How many ZK clients do you expect to have? I would run the same number
> >> of zk-latency.py instances with higher number of operations to get a
> >> more accurate picture. The performance also depends on whether you use
> >> asynchronous reads or synchronous reads.
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message