Return-Path: 
 <user-return-7344-apmail-zookeeper-user-archive=zookeeper.apache.org@zookeeper.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FD3EC90A
	for <apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:57:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 50282 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2014 04:57:28 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50224 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2014 04:57:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.zookeeper.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50213 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2014 04:57:27 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:57:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of static.void.dev@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.171] (HELO mail-vc0-f171.google.com)
 (209.85.220.171)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:57:21 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id lg15so350627vcb.16
        for <user@zookeeper.apache.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=IGeH6BBMoYXFirSRpu/qpjKz6gcKLn9m6ecmfgk8tRs=;
        b=hOZbmIqdBe8b4tMN3Upkz6dnMiWfpaaEAV4QRFrI/w+lh9zY0VnxZdKB+Tc+FHtUfG
         q8xmWARbN0X8jtpLwMzpW9yYwgMLmzybkCduE0urwCkURXZOpIDhhKEX+EtwP2qDjH8I
         xLAghp7C4I2CmEOxgDjhAv7BuBRlIeF1O4QdPxtEal+o2zMpPJR8CkjDNtSndK+UxwbP
         rZ4E8iWF332qNR+uK1gn22gsnKefkNXNJshgU7RZCFr/7vnF05zKUW6e4HTju9brD8j7
         e3FAuwZFK1kAVRNYLsAwidLjSgMtlx+xpx7wY6Edkqq11M33D3PdaXwxnfjCUFSxNvmA
         QWMg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.247.231 with SMTP id yh7mr3075804vdc.34.1395291420365;
 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.95.228 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:57:00 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAH-BiJi5fDm16w+DRUk5XzbxtiwD0S8MQj_otm_O+sH3gLfQcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Best pratice
From: Software Dev <static.void.dev@gmail.com>
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133c9aa78189604f502993a
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a1133c9aa78189604f502993a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

We currently have 4 separate ZK clusters (hbase, kafka, solr cloud, storm)
with either 3 or 5 per cluster. Should we combine all clusters into one and
just serve each one up in their own chroot?

--001a1133c9aa78189604f502993a--