Return-Path: 
 <user-return-7375-apmail-zookeeper-user-archive=zookeeper.apache.org@zookeeper.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC71A102E5
	for <apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:09:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 39634 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 03:09:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38873 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 03:09:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.zookeeper.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38847 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2014 03:09:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:09:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of comptechgeeky@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com)
 (209.85.212.182)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:09:10 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d1so1372777wiv.3
        for <user@zookeeper.apache.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=o69YwFgIiHKBjFvQFoQkGXwA5xS1yscyB9ZGnMIcKrc=;
        b=oweWghTIrvWqx7j7lE/VnuMA+4WW/sN32Sk7th0J1FKZKry7vZToPH/4UZnwtQtNlB
         NVr6gX3+nB7XaLIcGkpdyEi33Z4olUB3N0+2DcKFJcBToIJszlpyLsRYWM7vtxRUGyjh
         Z9v9X5tpBZttSQ9qUK3o9v9ejL9OvMmFHDicQ4ymFyKxAgJ76G9MGJluQvR8fhitl+C5
         a8RbufymlEK2AxwVqLy4DIIGjfBTSP3ssQDz/ea9Eud+8UY1QkxG8aLuJp9beNIdXLY0
         3G4GlLAbn8E9I1W2911JA7mR8TdR8OBSMTKw0jMPNj3+jcuAmht9vSs39x2XxfWnjcMn
         YH7A==
X-Received: by 10.180.98.71 with SMTP id eg7mr25727341wib.31.1395803329633;
 Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.208.200 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Check Peck <comptechgeeky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:08:29 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAF+A=7oD8y=sSMUbMuOGZVnUkkL6NUzMNW=vQ1syretTbPyi4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Load on Zookeeper cluster?
To: user <user@zookeeper.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428070a3a50904f579c920
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--f46d04428070a3a50904f579c920
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Has anyone done any load test on three node zookeeper cluster? In general,
I am trying to see how much requests per second, it can handle?

Any past experiences will help a lot.

I am using curator api to read from zookeeper node. And the configuration
of the machine is -

4vCPU, 12GB RAM, 60GB HD

--f46d04428070a3a50904f579c920--