zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Best pratice
Date Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:23:31 GMT
Test first without anything all that fancy gear.  For all of the
applications that you mention except Kafka, the actual transaction rate is
near nil.  A dedicated single spindle per ZK is likely to be be luxurious
accommodation.  I doubt seriously that you need SSD's.




On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Software Dev <static.void.dev@gmail.com>wrote:

> I was thinking SSD for zookeeper but traditional for the log directory.
> Memory wouldn't be a problem
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <michi@cs.stanford.edu
> >wrote:
>
> > It should be fine to consolidate so long as these applications don't
> > overload the ZooKeeper cluster in terms of memory usage and read/write
> > throughput. I would definitely test it first though :)
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Software Dev <static.void.dev@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > We currently have 4 separate ZK clusters (hbase, kafka, solr cloud,
> > storm)
> > > with either 3 or 5 per cluster. Should we combine all clusters into one
> > and
> > > just serve each one up in their own chroot?
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message