Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 356C0109C8 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74785 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2014 18:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 74743 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2014 18:21:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 74733 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2014 18:21:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:21:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of salabhanjika9@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.196] (HELO mail-wi0-f196.google.com) (209.85.212.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:21:26 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f196.google.com with SMTP id hi5so284561wib.3 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:21:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PAeOnmeGI5Zdn3Cji/f5yQM2yefuLHLfD/pRgKK7km4=; b=P0sIMkfatDmtb1w9AKtIdSsWCF+RaS8ZmTiApZVBAkSdOxgJQUi41JWUpBaCW95HmA Nv8KJaZaV6zl2N6mWI+L6sysNAw6bubxQNNFpbWQkKGMCznBh+9k//XVKiIiaZ4gahrS m18XCe03SARru2TjfBAwNF0dFIbDma1GUdTaM+irjEJQ2LDsehDV5RrIjo8IosCiHoZc oIrXjGUVQbx9gZFuxEgq3jQT9cTEzAGWspb5l1M4kPveC8o1mVpFeGm+ThcMPelspGDz Wv7KddQFONP0rnteJMBqcfIEkLcbrX/Dn0wvlvOwSdxn5rkRTGMEs3KWjQtm1y0Xqs2z w/Mw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.61.84 with SMTP id n20mr7668632wjr.61.1389118865874; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:21:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.27.168 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:21:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 23:51:05 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64) From: Salabhanjika S To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacb0b48d230504ef657075 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bacb0b48d230504ef657075 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Seems I'm not the first one to be misguided by documentation. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1635 Added a comment in this issue too. I interpret above jira as, C Client issue for Win-64 alone. If that is the case, should it more clear from documentation (admin guide). - Windows (win32 & win64) is supported as a *development and production platform* for both server and client (java client only). ZK-1635 reference can be provided here. Rationale behind this proposal is to bring more confidence to ZooKeeper users on Windows. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Salabhanjika S wrote: > Does ZooKeeper is supported on Windows (Win-64). When I searched through > the mailing list, I found > http://search-hadoop.com/m/pyVQoOgNQc/windows&subj=ZooKeeper+on+Windows > > > As per this discussion, there is no restriction/limitation as such. But > documentations claims "development only" support on Windows(Win-32). > > > http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_supportedPlatforms > > > Should this be a documentation fix? > --047d7bacb0b48d230504ef657075--