zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Staggered start of nodes in an ensemble
Date Tue, 12 Nov 2013 04:45:59 GMT
You might also ensure that the vms can communicate over the ports
you're using. No firewall say. Have you looked at the logs at all?
They might shed more light as well.

Patrick

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:13 PM, kishore g <g.kishore@gmail.com> wrote:
> can you provide the configurations (zoo.cfg) on each server. From the
> description, your server 1 seems to be incorrectly configured.
>
> thanks,
> Kishore G
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Arindam Mukherjee <
> arindam.mukerjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Of late I have been bombarding this list with questions and am getting
>> a little frustrated at my lack of understanding of ZooKeeper. I am up
>> against deadlines that look infeasible now. :(
>>
>> Anyway, having majorly failed to get going with 3.5.0 (you might see a
>> question earlier today), I decided, for the purposes of a PoC to
>> create a static 3.4.6 configuration. Say, create max 3 VMs, of which 2
>> are always up. Initially 1 and 2 would be up. I would be listing 3
>> servers in the config - server.1 through server.3.
>>
>> I brought up the servers on 1 and 2 in that order using "zkServer.sh
>> start-foreground". However they failed to connect and form a quorum
>> and the foreground server process showed an increasing timeout. Then I
>> brought up 3 at which point 2 and 3 were able to connect.
>>
>> Next I started zkCli.sh from 1 - it failed to connect to any box.
>> However the ones on 2 and 3 connected neatly. I am at a little loss to
>> explain this. Need help.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Arindam
>>

Mime
View raw message