Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B38D10317 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 00:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79829 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 00:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 79800 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 00:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 79791 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2013 00:20:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:20:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anurag.gujral@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.46] (HELO mail-vb0-f46.google.com) (209.85.212.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:20:38 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 10so4192734vbe.33 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:20:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mWMtj9159EcDvw4jGHGSpABX3x4p/MQRZxdRuJRMCv0=; b=bGvDq+Cg++q4NZEGbqA8RTnT/mFnj2mpQo27g5JQCfJ44mBQWqKzzX1D1NeIJVnx+r YNu1P2ihHQSGeDCqAeHzpoA9uCiJP7n6NJ/2/mWLQUFi6UlaYd55e0UJNMvJ03f3mhUe +d2DOCU33M2Oy9oFv4EYerxEIW2ITCBOHHKN0pesK853rROZIWgEa965AbUXztC/z6sp gGOrqUG8f5Vo+Mst9TK7Bqg16XFhku/vhsh2k+LHnu09YMYHsQMshwt9e1ovyyt8OogP uxSsco+fvgZH6jzYSElQLBTAIbiIDYzc1Nnf3WqRMUAZcOBrrBrroOW9BGDM/sQmlboW LOWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.36.4 with SMTP id sy4mr10666736vcb.11.1372724417436; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.29.66 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:20:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9E55E50C-D73A-4444-B4BA-60C8EBC57A8B@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:20:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Zookeeper on Windows From: Anurag Gujral To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11339f38469fbc04e07c4f8c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11339f38469fbc04e07c4f8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks everyone for the responses. What I get from above is that zookeeper server works on windows and so does the java windows client but status of windows C client is unknown, I can compile and check for myself if C client works on windows. Thanks Anurag On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > What it's meant in the past is that no one was willing to step up and > say they were using it in production and that it worked. :-) > > Patrick > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Camille Fournier > wrote: > > I don't know what "windows is not production ready" even means. ZooKeeper > > Java on windows is no big deal, it's as production-ready as any other > Java > > version. We did some work to get the C clients compiling in Visual > Studio a > > couple years ago but the windows test build has been broken for a while > so > > that might require some work to get running. > > As far as running ZooKeeper the server, most people run it on linux. I've > > run it in Windows for testing but not production. > > > > C > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Anurag Gujral >wrote: > > > >> Hi Camille, > >> I am sorry I was not clear in my email earlier, I am > >> talking about both java and C windows clients, I read the note on > zookeeper > >> wiki that windows is not yet production ready , does it means that > >> zookeeper window server is not production ready or zookeeper windows > client > >> is not production ready or both.Can you give names of some companies > which > >> are successfully using both java and C windows clients for zookeeper > with > >> either windows machines as zookeeper server or a linux machine as > zookeeper > >> server. > >> Thanks > >> Anurag > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Camille Fournier > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Do you mean the ZooKeeper server or ZooKeeper clients? There are many > >> > places using ZooKeeper clients on windows. > >> > > >> > C > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Flavio Junqueira < > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > The PoweredBy page does not say anything and I'm personally not > aware > >> of > >> > > any case that has been publicly disclosed. It would be nice to know, > >> > though. > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/PoweredBy > >> > > > >> > > -Flavio > >> > > > >> > > On Jul 1, 2013, at 10:56 PM, Anurag Gujral > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi All, > >> > > > Is anyone running zookeeper on windows with success? > >> Please > >> > > > let me know since I am exploring the possibility of using > zookeeper > >> in > >> > an > >> > > > enterprise world on windows. > >> > > > > >> > > > In case someone is successfully using zookeeper on windows please > >> share > >> > > > your experiences and also please let me know if you have to do > some > >> > code > >> > > > changes to make zookeeper run on windows. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks > >> > > > Anurag > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > --001a11339f38469fbc04e07c4f8c--