Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D5C5D001 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37664 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2012 15:55:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 37336 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2012 15:55:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 37301 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2012 15:55:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:55:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanchan404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.170] (HELO mail-qc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.216.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:55:00 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so1511532qca.15 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Nz9SLhQBpSiP4WUeufVG8xelfkM27z27zmij8D0b28=; b=xeMHKgNA2TBukc0Lq0jLNaZSMH9frSciIkuoiqKtSm7cZHOcZC/pus82LLBuDvMf6u mC2CYp507a6OdTvWeJ5S1yg+FBOCtvUgVGxdZ7ISnzHIrg5v1u6UmRyaAgoJzwv6HTXG udlIepVhpU1YTwM2CQvqpMi2dzC/X8VzJwJGBriNA3d4vJfvfQJKSE9nRo9Tbz6jfLXM uwT8zHDzG8+GSXD3CBFVmaC31/uTh/ZF+SdqML6d5C77Q66hHHT19VeGuAa5B3fuJto7 JI8XDMGiP23WEg3lCoLHdjRR5sStj1UAHWbc23bfmx6q1oJhcSLW14kiYnnLpiCb71s7 /wUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.49.234 with SMTP id x10mr5168724qen.53.1350921279464; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.62.33 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:54:39 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Cloudera Zookeeper or Daemontools Zookeeper From: Ryan Chan To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Currently I am using Cloudera Zookeeper under Ubuntu and it work fines but according to this page: >> The ZK server is designed to be "fail fast" meaning that it will shutdow= n (process exit) if an error occurs that it cannot recover from..as the clu= ster is "self healing" the failed server once restarted will automatically = rejoin the ensemble w/o any manual interaction.. http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.3/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_supervision As Cloudera is using the old style init script (not even upstart), so does it mean that by replacing it with a upstart script with respawn or even Daemontools will make my Zookeeper installation more robust? Thanks.