Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 582DFDD2D for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15337 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2012 19:22:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 15216 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2012 19:22:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 15191 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2012 19:22:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:22:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.170] (HELO mail-we0-f170.google.com) (74.125.82.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:21:54 +0000 Received: by weyr1 with SMTP id r1so2780475wey.15 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:21:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=hSgcrDv8anidmYJwRvgsl0vrZezedvgpvZDRCT0LGbY=; b=WSUyjFkcxsA93aCamM7Sruabaxd89UY0KwNcV5TB9r2yTQOpggDMw09e27m1D3VIC7 dBhFk5kdfRIT24MUKAACKKeRW26ezZ7hdWR2Kl4azXN7Ul+3WPh+SKq1lYMEyhysKmp2 vq1kv6B/DEAvk/EHLacG1/mvdlNTXPn/sQ7Vrl6PaLrV0pX4hLld0FUflonXf7Hzzayo ZnNCmnejJId7LB54OL6PTE3nekM8q3NI3tZ5hL6J7JzZZN7QNmN04JxzqP5gV4+GVQWm YbjcCBgIYhWwoWWVaHZPA9QkAaZl3sZDnweaiUamw7AojqhDaIqyYFFu8RM219kM99+B lDNw== Received: by 10.180.84.104 with SMTP id x8mr25277958wiy.20.1346700093637; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:21:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.211 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:21:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Session refused, zxid too high To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bd758b343f904c8d10ce2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043bd758b343f904c8d10ce2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes. Is this a C-based client? If so, memory corruption is less surprising. If java based, then such memory corruption is big news. On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Simon Doherty wrote: > Thanks very much for your help people! > > So the strange zxid value was supplied by the client during session > start up. That suggests to me that it's a bug in the client I'm using. > Is that true? > > Thanks > > > > Simon > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Mahadev Konar > wrote: > > Nice debugging Pat! Really interesting! :) > > > > thanks > > mahadev > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> This is interesting, if you convert 0x636c65616e2d7374 to ascii you > >> get "clean-st". Looks like memory corruption to me. > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >>> Good point Ted. Is this a java ZK client or something else? (memory > >>> corruption on client possible?) > >>> > >>> Patrick > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > >>>> But isn't the larger ZXID pretty stunningly large? > >>>> > >>>> The epoch number is nearly 2 billion and the transaction id is 845 > million. > >>>> These seem implausible from a starting point of 0. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Patrick Hunt > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > seen zxid 0x636c65616e2d7374 our last zxid is 0x9ba client > --f46d043bd758b343f904c8d10ce2--