zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Millions of opened connections to Zookeeper cluster possible?
Date Tue, 18 Sep 2012 04:11:11 GMT
sorry.

Hit send a bit early.

I meant a special purpose proxy that limits the amount of notification that
goes out by changing the semantics a bit.  You really don't want millions
of change notices to go out all at once.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Morris Bernstein <
morris@systems-deployment.com> wrote:

> Uhm, yeah, that's what I meant...
> On Sep 17, 2012 7:59 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Another option is to use a proxy.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Morris Bernstein <
> > morris@systems-deployment.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The obvious solution would be running multiple Zookeepers
> hierarchically.
> > > Each server would take, say, 1000 clients.  Each server would be a
> client
> > > of an uber Zookeeper.  It'll increase latency some, but it scales.
> > > On Sep 17, 2012 3:57 PM, "Martin Kou" <bitanarch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having a use case where there're potentially millions of client
> > > > processes connected to a Zookeeper cluster, but only a very small
> > > > proportion of them would be actively sending requests or receiving
> any
> > > data
> > > > (say, about 1000 of them every second) at any time. Has anyone tried
> > this
> > > > before?
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Martin Kou
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message