zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amirhossein Kiani <amirhki...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Are curator framework consumers single threaded?
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:59:34 GMT
Thanks JZ!  So for using the Executor in the PathChildrenCache, how does that work? Because
previously I had the logic in the listener. Who will run the executor and how do I get the
info about the changed node there?


On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:02 AM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:

> The ListenerContainer for PathChildrenCache allows you to pass an Executor along with
your listener. So, that will give you the desired behavior. DistributedQueue is _supposed_
to allow this as well, but it looks like it doesn't. I view that as a bug. If you don't mind,
please post an issue on this here:
> https://github.com/Netflix/curator/issues
> -JZ
> ________________________________________
> From: Amirhossein Kiani [amirhkiani@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:18 PM
> To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
> Subject: Are curator framework consumers single threaded?
> Hi Jordan,
> First of all, thanks a lot for all the great work on Curator! I have started using it
and it is amazingly simplifying my code!
> I have just ran into this issue recently that I am using a Distributed Queue, a Path
Cache and a Distributed Double Barrier in my code, and having some difficulties. I'm trying
to run everything with the test framework Curator provides and it seems like when I enter()
the barrier in one of my objects the other one (that is using a different client) is also
> Is there a way to have the Queue consumer object as well as Event listeners for the Path
Cache start in new threads?
> Many thanks,
> Amir

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message