Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4F32F30B.8010204@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:11:23 +0100
From: Pierre Louis Aublin <pierre-louis.aublin@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Subject: Re: use cases for asynchronous API
References: <4F32F2A4.4070401@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4F32F2A4.4070401@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02/08/2012 11:09 PM, Pierre Louis Aublin wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> I would like to know if the asynchronous operations of the client API 
> are often used in applications that use Zookeeper.
> In [1] I found 3 applications built on Zookeeper (the Yahoo! Fetching 
> Service, Katta and the Yahoo! Message Broker). However, I do not find 
> if they use the synchronous or asynchronous operations.
>
> The big question I am trying to answer is : is it relevant to consider 
> a closed-loop model in order to benchmark replicated services 
> (Zookeeper being a good candidate to build replicated services)? Can 
> you give me any clue on that?
One must read open-loop model, not closed-loop.
Sorry for that mistake.