zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: sync vs. async vs. multi performances
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:57:35 GMT
Yes it is possible.

With a loaded server, each group of transactions wiill take about one
rotation.  But the time from when they arrived to the time that they are
committed will be roughly 0 ... 8 ms for a 7200 RPM drive because the
transactions will be arriving at different times.

There will be overheads which make this untrue, but the basic idea that you
don't necessarily have to wait for a full rotation if you arrive partway
through a rotation is correct.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ariel Weisberg <aweisberg@voltdb.com>wrote:

> ...
> I used (http://pastebin.com/uu7igM3J) and the results for 4k writes were
> http://pastebin.com/N26CJtQE. 8.5 milliseconds, which is a bit slower than
> 5. Is it possible to beat the rotation speed?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message