Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of neha.narkhede@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-odoLngNuK-Jwi2QN=S=pZwXiv++qzub25Hm5vQYm7ZtU4Mw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAF+j8akaurOWQPR+-fGfbpX0aaTWvf5dc82F=u2DOeppuDQHfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJwFCa3Xh8EesQHH=FJNjzwVGtRZ8L54+4WrA07xa-XZZtJt9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFKfxwuLQVdz-iLw9LFkJorLY+FYkFzq-KW6h=ezL1KH=d70GQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFbh0Q0Z5a8YAZzdNWsbj5K59qZ9L6yUBmJLDYaHaa5u6W5HzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLc_9JTGnwEro1WorLnikd+7gBw_XkoHWD6gxg9FTAx+2mf3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFbh0Q2oscBqjcJEvFb_VYkTCJfYsWEPn8yzkD6EdXq65NQKOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLc_9Lkf4oH7fJVizK90aQEk-A7Y6fdLc=JmVEQyqR2wEaY4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFbh0Q2HQ-in=7N_qPu6VL2PXz-Fv=homXsoV1mkyam+RjYcFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLc_9KxiuN81a4UnZy4g8=Hcb71GOD6Zq8TOyu_GjXn5BFcpg@mail.gmail.com>
	<7989089555007163509@unknownmsgid>
	<CALF7aMSUv+SLty-wUYsTwbpJFA5JoJ_JJ0WWBf+C4mzimPewJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJwFCa3wcMkhfF-Ecqh_Kfr+XcXEyeqKb2xfZ6rGX6n+-rudoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADMB+XbV1z4p-3jGCdYR7pbMrUpTOwM_m=x5tO=n5G9ny9umQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-odoLngNuK-Jwi2QN=S=pZwXiv++qzub25Hm5vQYm7ZtU4Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:39:45 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOG_4QZayEFgAV9PrJ=exM43gjmoR=aE=+2Q4pm9dBKqd+tC1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Zookeeper 3.4
From: Neha Narkhede <neha.narkhede@gmail.com>
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For Kafka at LinkedIn, we would love to have the chroot bug fixed as
part of zookeeper 3.3.4

Thanks,
Neha

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
<mathias.herberts@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>
> +1
> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <adam@rosien.net> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>> >
>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.co=
m
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dima,
>> > > =C2=A0Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code =
and
>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include in=
to
>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. =C2=A0What do others feel abt it?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > mahadev
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>> > > <dima.gutzeit@mailvision.com> wrote:
>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27 =D7=91=D7=90=D7=95=D7=A7 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <phunt=
@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM=
.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Patrick
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing =
the
>> > > chroot
>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complain=
ing
>> > > about
>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Jun
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think=
 we
>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>> 3.4.x
>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Patrick
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.o=
rg
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>> > > dan@midokura.com
>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>> performance,
>> > > but
>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. =C2=A0It is incredibly convenie=
nt! =C2=A0We
>> > > built
>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to th=
e
>> > > release!
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>> > > ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along wi=
th
>> > the
>> > > >>>> rest
>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>> required.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
>> > raj.cassandra@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
>> use
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
>> > > ).
>> > > >>>> Has
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performa=
nce
>> > > gain
>> > > >>>>>> does
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>