zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mathias Herberts <mathias.herbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Zookeeper 3.4
Date Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:26:16 GMT
Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.

+1
On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <adam@rosien.net> wrote:

> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
> >
> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Dima,
> > >  Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> > > a stable bugfix release for now.  What do others feel abt it?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > mahadev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> > > <dima.gutzeit@mailvision.com> wrote:
> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> > > >>
> > > >> Patrick
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing
the
> > > chroot
> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> > > about
> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Jun
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally
think we
> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
> 3.4.x
> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Patrick
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jun
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined?
Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Jun
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu
<
> > > dan@midokura.com
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not
for the
> performance,
> > > but
> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property.  It is incredibly
convenient!  We
> > > built
> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking
forward to the
> > > release!
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning
<
> > > ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it
might come along with
> > the
> > > >>>> rest
> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single
commit is
> required.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj
N <
> > raj.cassandra@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper
3.4? I would like to
> use
> > > the
> > > >>>>>> batch
> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> > > ).
> > > >>>> Has
> > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one?
How much of a performance
> > > gain
> > > >>>>>> does
> > > >>>>>>>>>> batch
> > > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message