zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Zookeeper 3.4
Date Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:39:45 GMT
For Kafka at LinkedIn, we would love to have the chroot bug fixed as
part of zookeeper 3.3.4

Thanks,
Neha

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
<mathias.herberts@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>
> +1
> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <adam@rosien.net> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>> >
>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dima,
>> > >  Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>> > > a stable bugfix release for now.  What do others feel abt it?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > mahadev
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>> > > <dima.gutzeit@mailvision.com> wrote:
>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as
RM.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Patrick
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing
the
>> > > chroot
>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>> > > about
>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Jun
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally
think we
>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes
until
>> 3.4.x
>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Patrick
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined?
Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai
Dumitriu <
>> > > dan@midokura.com
>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well,
not for the
>> performance,
>> > > but
>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property.  It is incredibly
convenient!  We
>> > > built
>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely
looking forward to the
>> > > release!
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning
<
>> > > ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but
it might come along with
>> > the
>> > > >>>> rest
>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and
single commit is
>> required.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results
on this.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM,
Raj N <
>> > raj.cassandra@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper
3.4? I would like to
>> use
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
>> > > ).
>> > > >>>> Has
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this
one? How much of a performance
>> > > gain
>> > > >>>>>> does
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message