Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5A5E7358 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27809 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2011 23:39:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 27769 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2011 23:39:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 27758 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2011 23:39:41 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:39:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wy0-f170.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:39:40 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2347603wyf.15 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:39:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.204.141 with SMTP id fm13mr12845886wbb.12.1319672379215; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.38.94 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:39:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:39:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Zookeeper 3.4 From: Patrick Hunt To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x code line has stabilized for production use. Patrick On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release? > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Voting is currently under way on the dev list: >> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks, >> > >> > Jun >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu > >wrote: >> > >> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but >> >> for the atomicity property. =A0It is incredibly convenient! =A0We bui= lt >> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release! >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning >> >> wrote: >> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the re= st >> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required. >> >> > >> >> > I would love to hear your results on this. >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the >> batch >> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). H= as >> >> >> anybody >> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain >> does >> >> >> batch >> >> >> update give? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> -Raj >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >