zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Use a RAM database to store zookeeper data
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:04:05 GMT
Also keep in mind that it probably won't change throughput all that much.

You should run tests before counting your chickens.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Kapil Thangavleu <kapil.foss@gmail.com>wrote:

> Excerpts from PADIOU Pierre-Marie (MORPHO)'s message of Fri Sep 09 04:50:19
> -0700 2011:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Suppose I've got only < live > data in zookeeper, but I want high write
> throughput. Is there any issue with using /dev/shm to store zookeeper data?
> (Assuming datalogs are properly cleaned up)
> >
> > Has anyone ever done that?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Pierre-Marie
>
> I occasionally do something similiar for running large test suites. a tmpfs
> mount for the data dirs, and /dev/null for log4j. Keep in mind zk is
> already
> keeping data in memory, so ram usage is at least 2x data set size with
> this.
>
> cheers,
>
> Kapil
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message