Return-Path: 
 <user-return-3699-apmail-zookeeper-user-archive=zookeeper.apache.org@zookeeper.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2F5181C4
	for <apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:20:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 53164 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2011 02:20:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53110 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2011 02:20:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@zookeeper.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.zookeeper.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53095 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2011 02:20:29 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:20:29 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.218.42] (HELO mail-yi0-f42.google.com) (209.85.218.42)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:20:22 +0000
Received: by yie16 with SMTP id 16so3851644yie.15
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.125.161 with SMTP id z21mr29482572yhh.58.1314670799735;
 Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.146.108.14 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [1.212.30.211]
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABWqe2Y7x-2WePz8866-qUqFFdrAHSjqaK8pG9N-_LqQLZaeVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALXUk3wQHL+dcOP+9ETxme7MevZewPau2jGcHK2LvbGz6XAHJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABWqe2Yq2rAeoy1q3O3S83aWSWHtcDzRtRvxmBioDkLN7rZWYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABWqe2Y7x-2WePz8866-qUqFFdrAHSjqaK8pG9N-_LqQLZaeVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:19:59 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CALXUk3wtUNCy-vBpp_0C2_dMQ6ZUnVKZZibh2hy8Cd2C=BCSEA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NodeExistsException when creating a znode with sequential and
 ephemeral mode
From: =?EUC-KR?B?udq/tbHZKEFsZXgp?= <alex.park@nexr.com>
To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
Cc: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3036388103ca4004abafa677

--20cf3036388103ca4004abafa677
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We used 3.3.3.

We will check out the latest code.

Thanks Camille.

Alex

2011/8/30 Camille Fournier <camille@apache.org>

> More specifically, we fixed this for the upcoming release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1046
>
> You can try checking out the latest code and building it, should fix
> your error. I believe 3.3.4 will be released in a week or two.
>
> c
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Camille Fournier <camille@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > What version of ZK were you using?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:50 PM, =B9=DA=BF=B5=B1=D9(Alex) <alex.park@ne=
xr.com> wrote:
> >> Hi, all
> >>
> >> I met a problem of NodeExistsException when creating a znode with
> sequential
> >> and ephemeral mode.
> >> the number of total test was 6442314 and 797 errors had occurred.
> >>
> >> The related log message is as in the following:
> >> 2011-08-27 16:26:17,559 - INFO
>  [ProcessThread:-1:PrepRequestProcessor@407][]
> >> - Got user-level KeeperException when processing
> sessionid:0x2320911802a0002
> >> type:create cxid:0x1246d7 zxid:0xfffffffffffffffe txntype:unknown
> >> reqpath:n/a Error
> >> Path:/NexR/MasteElection/__rwLock/readLock-lssm07-0005967078
> >> Error:KeeperErrorCode =3D NodeExists for
> >> /NexR/MasteElection/__rwLock/readLock-lssm07-0005967078
> >>
> >> The sequential number would be created by increasing parent's Cversion
> in
> >> the PrepRequestProcess.
> >> So, I guess that this problem was caused by inconsistency of parent
> znode.
> >>
> >> Our test scenario is very aggressive:
> >> The grinder agent sends a request of creating a znode of
> >> CreateMode. SEQUENTIAL_EPHEMERAL.
> >> three number of servers compose ensemble.
> >> each NIC of server is down and up repeatedly;
> >> NIC of server1 become down every one minute and sleeping for 9 seconds=
,
> then
> >> up
> >> NIC of server2 become down every 2 minute and sleeping for 9 seconds,
> then
> >> up
> >> NIC of server3 become down every 3 minute and sleeping for 9 seconds,
> then
> >> up
> >>
> >> while the probability of error occurrence is 0.0001 as mentioned above=
,
> >> if the ZooKeeper cannot guarantee the consistency, it is  a fatal.
> >>
> >> Is there any idea or related issue?
> >>
> >> thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> alex.
> >>
> >
>

--20cf3036388103ca4004abafa677--