Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8532C4577 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86705 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:20:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 86624 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 86608 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 19:20:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:20:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Camille.Fournier@gs.com designates 204.4.187.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.4.187.100] (HELO mxecd05.gs.com) (204.4.187.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:20:14 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,371,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="296501938" Received: from unknown (HELO mxpbd02-public.ny.fw.gs.com) ([148.86.115.129]) by mxecd05.idz.gs.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2011 15:19:53 -0400 From: "Fournier, Camille F." X-sendergroup: RELAYLIST Received: from gshcbdp06ex.firmwide.corp.gs.com ([139.172.19.145]) by mxpbd02.ny.fw.gs.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2011 15:19:53 -0400 Received: from GSCMAMP02EX.firmwide.corp.gs.com ([139.172.184.156]) by gshcbdp06ex.firmwide.corp.gs.com ([139.172.19.145]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:19:53 -0400 To: "'user@zookeeper.apache.org'" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:19:51 -0400 Subject: RE: Debian packager orphaning ZooKeeper Thread-Topic: Debian packager orphaning ZooKeeper Thread-Index: AcwrjxVnpW55KIhXT5CZoxggmiuhxQAAXrng Message-ID: <69D3016305F9084FBD2C4A0DF189BD5C176D01C2FE@GSCMAMP02EX.firmwide.corp.gs.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-retentionstamp: Firmwide Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Again, you seem too easily offended when touching on the subject, > which makes Thomas' points valid. =20 No it doesn't. He is allowed to be offended and it has no bearing on the tr= uth of the matter. This isn't a Shakespearian play.=20 C -----Original Message----- From: Gustavo Niemeyer [mailto:gustavo@niemeyer.net]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:04 PM To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Re: Debian packager orphaning ZooKeeper > =A0I am all for code quality. I myself am targetting 3.5.0 for some code > cleanup. The issues have been talked about and some of them will be > addressed and some other are pure nonsense. Complaning about in all That's excellent news, thanks for working on this Mahadev. > over the world doesnt help and posting those complaints time and again > on the dev list (folks who are working on it) is offensive. Again, you seem too easily offended when touching on the subject, which makes Thomas' points valid. If you are already working on clean ups, simply pointing out what is going on will be much more effective and comforting than fighting about the subject being touched by people that use and care about your software. --=20 Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net http://niemeyer.net/blog http://niemeyer.net/twitter