To help people who see differences as slowly as I do, the change suggested
is to change smallest to largest.
Clearly the smallest j is the oldest one and Ishaaq does seem to have found
an error in the statement of the algorithm.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ishaaq Chandy <ishaaq@gmail.com> wrote:
> Step 3 of the first phase (creation of the znode) says:
>
> "Watch for changes on "ELECTION/n_j", where j is the smallest sequence
> number such that j < i and n_j is a znode in C;"
>
> Wouldn't this cause the herd effect? Shouldn't this be:
>
> "Watch for changes on "ELECTION/n_j", where j is the largest sequence
> number
> such that j < i and n_j is a znode in C;"
>
