Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=j0YmYS=wEXZb4ZNkjvHpu=1oLJGnAt2UYB2FP@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201102120958.10602.thomas@koch.ro>
	<E1EC1110-E6F9-4E90-8371-DF8444EA43C7@yahoo-inc.com>
	<201102121451.37126.thomas@koch.ro>
	<4D58B1EE.5040707@yahoo-inc.com>
	<AANLkTimj_=gd5NQE_gFx0y7HGq_qHUBgxXBqfyOYt_yP@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=j0YmYS=wEXZb4ZNkjvHpu=1oLJGnAt2UYB2FP@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:24:05 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJ4L_GT71aQ9Do=sikoj13y-HH5Ye5g6R-rWNt@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: write permission on ZooKeeper Wiki?
From: Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org, Benjamin Reed <breed@apache.org>
Cc: Mahadev Konar <mahadev@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Ben, what's the status on this? Seems to me that given we have CMS
we should allow any registered user to edit the cwiki pages. This
level of permissions is essentially what we did on the old wiki, no?
(anyone registered could edit).

Patrick

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@apache.org> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> What are the 2 level of acls?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>> Ben should we make it so that anyone logged in can edit any of the zk
>> wiki pages?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Benjamin Reed <breed@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>> you are right about the s4 guys. i'll bug them to put something up.
>>>
>>> the permissions on confluence are a bit tricky. (two levels of ACLs.) i
>>> think i've fixed it for you. can you see if you can edit the page now? (you
>>> have to be logged in of course.)
>>>
>>> thanx for pointing this out!
>>>
>>> ben
>>>
>>> On 02/12/2011 05:51 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Flavio Junqueira:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Thomas, It is good for us as a community to have a long PoweredBy
>>>>> page, but my preference would be to let the developers of applications
>>>>> include themselves their applications. We know of a number of
>>>>> applications, but the developers might not necessarily want to have
>>>>> their projects on our wiki page for whatever reason.
>>>>>
>>>>> This message actually could be seen as a call for developers to add
>>>>> their projects to the page.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Flavio,
>>>>
>>>> for free software projects that publicitly state on their homepage and on
>>>> public talks with public slides that they use ZooKeeper, it may be safe to
>>>> assume that they're ok with being listed as ZooKeeper users.
>>>> It would of couse be fine, if every zk user would list themself in the
>>>> wiki,
>>>> but that would require them to know that there is a poweredby page and to
>>>> get
>>>> an account for the wiki and to actually care for the publicity of ZK.
>>>>
>>>> That being said, I still don't know, whether the poweredby page is
>>>> editable to
>>>> start with. Where is the edit button?
>>>>
>>>> You could be a good role model and add S4[1] to the poweredby page. :-) It
>>>> does use ZK, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://s4.io
>>>>
>>>> If you don't want that we list projects on the poweredby page, would you
>>>> be so
>>>> kind and give me a short brain dump what other interesting and public
>>>> users of
>>>> ZK you know?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro
>>>
>>>
>>
>