zookeeper-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Enrico Olivelli (Jira)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2398) Config options should not be only available via system property
Date Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:42:04 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Enrico Olivelli updated ZOOKEEPER-2398:
    Fix Version/s: 3.5.7

> Config options should not be only available via system property
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2398
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2398
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jason Rosenberg
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.6, 3.5.7
> Some config options (such as enabling readonly mode) are only settable via a system property.
 This feels clunky, and makes it less seamless for testing, or for apps which embed a ZooKeeper
inside a java container, etc.
> I ran into this issue specifically in the case of creating unit tests to test read-only
mode client side behavior.  In this case, I want to run multiple QuorumPeer's in the same
jvm, and have some of them enabled for read-only and some not enabled.  This is not possible
with the current System.setProperty approach.
> In general, I question the need for using system properties for configuration, since
it makes embedding a server within a dependency injection framework more difficult, and is
in general less easy to integrate into generic deployment systems.

This message was sent by Atlassian Jira

View raw message