zookeeper-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "TisonKun (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-3465) Introduce BookKeeper checkstyle configuration
Date Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:17:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16891970#comment-16891970

TisonKun commented on ZOOKEEPER-3465:

Hi [~maoling] and [~eolivelli], after an investigation of Google's and BookKeeper's checkstyle
configuration. I have to point out that zookeeper is more likely to obey BookKeeper's configruation
generally. If we use Google's configuration, rules like those of indent would cause a wide
range of code conflict. Besides, BookKeeper's configuration includes rules used in ZooKeeper
simple configuration.

I tend to use BookKeeper's checkstyle configuration and locally test compatibility.

A pr towards this JIRA would be ready in minutes.

> Introduce BookKeeper checkstyle configuration
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3465
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: TisonKun
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
> For enable BookKeeper checkstyle configuration, we introduce a silent configuration.
> Also
> 1. remove FileContentsHolder rule for checkstyle version compatibility.
> 2. check all rules in the simple checkstyle configuration included.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message