zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sujith simon <sujithsimo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4
Date Fri, 11 Oct 2019 06:01:31 GMT
+1 (non-binding)

- Verified Checksum
- Verified Signature
- Verfied that tags are correct
- Verified build, installed ZooKeeper and tested basic commands from source
tarball
- Installed ZooKeeper from bin tarball on a 3 node cluster and tested basic
ZooKeeper commands
- Verified that Unit tests are passing

Thanks :)


On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 PM Norbert Kalmar <nkalmar@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - unit tests pass
> - built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball
> - checked bin tarball, license files, run ZK + few commands
> - signature OK.
> - git tag OK :)
>
> Thanks Enrico!
>
> Norbert
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:45 PM Andor Molnar <andor@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Verified…
> >
> > - checksums, signature,
> > - unit tests
> > - 3-node cluster smoke tests.
> >
> > Andor
> >
> >
> > > On 2019. Oct 9., at 22:40, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Il mer 9 ott 2019, 21:14 Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> ha scritto:
> > >
> > >> +1 checksums/sig validated. rat ran clean and I was able to build and
> > >> exercise the code just fine with java 8.
> > >>
> > >> Note dep check is failing again however:
> > >>
> > >> jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar
> > >> (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind@2.9.10,
> > >> cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*,
> > >> cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson-databind:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) :
> > >> CVE-2019-16942, CVE-2019-16943
> > >>
> > >> I looked at the issue and they seem very specific, given that and the
> > >> status of databind these days I think we should get this one next time
> > >> around vs re-re... spinning the rc. What do you think?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Agreed.
> > > And as we are doing a very limited use of Jackson we can look for a
> > > replacement
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Patrick
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:46 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.6.
> > >>>
> > >>> It fixes 29 issues, including upgrade of third party libraries,
> > >>> TTL Node APIs for C API, support for PCKS12 Keystores, upgrade of
> > Netty 4
> > >>> and better procedure for the upgrade of servers from 3.4 to 3.5.
> > >>>
> > >>> The full release notes is available at:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12345243
> > >>>
> > >>> *** Please download, test and vote by October 11th 2019, 23:59 UTC+0.
> > ***
> > >>>
> > >>> Source files:
> > >>> https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.5.6-candidate-4
> > >>>
> > >>> Maven staging repo:
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1044
> > >>>
> > >>> The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.5.6-rc4
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.6-rc4
> > >>>
> > >>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> Should we release this candidate?
> > >>>
> > >>> Enrico Olivelli
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message